![]() 05/06/2017 at 14:35 • Filed to: Planelopnik | ![]() | ![]() |
Twin Piper Cub was a thing. A weird thing, but a thing.
![]() 05/06/2017 at 14:39 |
|
wut
![]() 05/06/2017 at 14:53 |
|
looks like a disaster waiting to happen
![]() 05/06/2017 at 15:17 |
|
Even weirder; apparently it was made using a Cub and a Cub Coupe. It still only had two seats too. Only the right fuselage was used and instead of some fancy synchronizer to keep the props from hitting the added a spacer to move the left prop forward.
http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/models/aircraft/Piper-TwinCub.html
That makes the tri-pacer twin look almost normal!
![]() 05/06/2017 at 16:53 |
|
But that has one fuselage where the OP has a dual fuselage.
![]() 05/06/2017 at 16:56 |
|
Yes, I just included it because it was the next design attempt from Harold Wagner to create a budget twin engine aircraft.
![]() 05/06/2017 at 17:17 |
|
This and the Twin Ercoupe, they’re like cousins!
![]() 05/06/2017 at 17:36 |
|
yes
![]() 05/06/2017 at 17:43 |
|
ah that explains it a bit better, wondered how they engineered it to try and prevent blades from clashing
![]() 05/06/2017 at 17:44 |
|
It’s disappointing, I was hoping for some clever meshing instead of just an offset.
![]() 05/06/2017 at 17:45 |
|
that’s what I was expecting but the potential for the 2 props to clash is rather high due to rpm fluctuation amongst other things
![]() 05/06/2017 at 17:46 |
|
Yeah, you need to have some mechanism to keep them in time. I think there are some multi-prop helicopters with blades that can mesh?
![]() 05/06/2017 at 17:56 |
|